Approx 2 minute read
Like our content? Join our ecosystem to receive fresh news and updates in real-time.
Imagine a scenario: a newly certified worker is assigned to oversee a complex mechanical process in a mining operation. Two weeks in, a misstep leads to a critical failure. Post-incident analysis reveals that although the worker had "passed" their training, there was no actual field-based validation of their competency. The system failed—not due to malice or laziness, but due to invisibility.
This scenario is far from hypothetical. OSHA reports that training-related incidents cost U.S. employers over $62 billion annually, much of which can be traced to unverifiable competency assessments (OSHA, 2023). When training systems rely on outdated verification methods—like paper checklists or verbal confirmations—they leave organizations vulnerable to blind spots.
The consequences extend beyond safety. One Canadian mining company faced $8.2 million in losses after a conveyor system was damaged by an improperly trained technician. Investigators found that the technician had never been evaluated in the field. His "certification" had come from a simulation test, signed off by a supervisor under time pressure. The incident laid bare a sobering truth: in high-stakes operations, assuming readiness is as dangerous as negligence.
Visibility into readiness is not just a compliance feature—it’s an operational imperative. Field-based human-verified, digital assessments can close this gap by providing timestamped records, multi-media evidence, and direct line of sight for managers. These tools not only confirm that a task was completed—they verify how well it was performed and under what conditions.
Takeaway: Completion isn't the finish line — competency is.
To protect your people and your operation, you need a closed-loop system that does more than confirm that training happened—you need one that proves readiness. Audit your current field training approach. Where are supervisors still relying on paper checklists? Where is validation subjective, unverifiable, or missing entirely?
It’s time to implement field-first, supervisor-driven tools that digitize, guide, and verify every step of competency assessment. Capture real-world evidence. Ensure consistency across locations. And close gaps before they become incidents.
If your current system can't prove someone is ready, it's not ready either.
